Effective use of assessment data across a multi academy trust

Written by

Jevon Hirst

Training Director, Alps

Sue Macgregor

Director of Education and Product Development, Alps

Developing robust monitoring systems for assessment data across your schools can be complicated and time-consuming. Here, Sue Macgregor and Jevon Hirst from Alps share some of the advantages to developing a trust-wide monitoring system.

In his keynote session at the CST School Improvement Conference last summer, Professor Rob Coe (Director of Research and Development, Evidence Based Education) said:

"Without good assessment and monitoring systems, there is no quality assurance - which is a mainstay of effective leadership and school improvement.”

There are many benefits to developing a single data tracking system which is embedded across all schools in a trust, here are some of the key gains that our trusts have discovered.

One system, one language

A common data system will support the development of a common language across all schools in a trust, creating a uniform approach to many aspects of the raising standards agenda, from target setting to interventions. This can have an immediate and striking impact on the quality of conversations, better understanding and the creation of a shared culture for performance improvement.

Common assessment cycles

Understanding outcomes from examination results is essential in allowing MAT leaders to establish priorities across the trust. In addition, an effective data system can also support the implementation of a robust trust-wide assessment framework, enabling the proactive use of internal summative assessment data as part of on-going quality assurance processes.

Synchronising assessment cycles across numerous schools, can present many challenges, including the timely collection of aligned, accurate and complete data from multiple different sources.  Importantly, any centralised data system must be flexible enough to allow schools some autonomy over when they collect and track data, alongside the needs of the trust to analyse data across all schools within a defined time window for effective and fair review.

A common system can strike the balance between a school leader’s requirement for a flexible data tracking system, which can be tailored to their specific setting, and their responsibility to the trust to provide data analysis which allows MAT leaders to compare strengths and weaknesses across all schools quickly, and facilitate them in asking the right questions at the right time, to hold each school to account.

Culture of collaboration

Outstanding data systems can also be used as a key tool to enable MAT leaders to drive effective learning and teaching strategy across the trust so that their students are given a consistent and equal opportunity to thrive.

Within their paper ‘Knowledge Building – School Improvement at Scale’ Buckham and Cruddas (2021) say that successful school improvement across a trust is centred on developing teachers to be "as good as they can be in what they teach (curriculum) and in how they teach (pedagogy) ”. In order to achieve this goal, the authors identify a clear need for practice informed by evidence and strong structures that facilitate professional development.

A centralised data system can make a significant contribution to the development of structures which support professional development. Utilising assessment data at a trust level means that leaders with responsibility for driving schools' improvement can identify best practice using examination and internal summative data. This can then be used to support the development of evidence-based collaborative networks focused on facilitating professional development where there is a keen focus on sharing and developing next and best practice across schools.

In summary, the trusts with whom we work have all found significant benefits in using a single, effective data system across all their schools; saving time for all stakeholders, creating a greater collective understanding and fostering better collaboration to support the drive to performance improvement for students.

Sue Macgregor is the Director of Education at Alps and Dr Jevon Hirst is the Director of Training. Both work closely and successfully with trusts using the Alps Summit platform to strategically analyse and review performance across multiple schools in a simple, easy, and effective way. This allows trusts to identify areas for celebration and those that require strategies for improvement.

If you would like to find out more, visit us on our website or book a demo with us today.

The CST Blog welcomes perspectives from a diverse range of guest contributors. The opinions expressed in blogs are the views of the author(s), and should not be read as CST guidance or CST’s position.

Back to all blogs

Tags

Category

Read other articles based on this category

Company no: 05303883
Charity no: 1107640

Contact details

Confederation of School Trusts (CST)
Suite 1, Whiteley Mill
39 Nottingham Road
Stapleford
Nottingham    NG9 8AD

0115 9170142

admin@cstuk.org.uk

Social media